The first is to mistakenly interpret the chance to come to power as the majority of public opinion endorsing "Taiwan independence." Lai Ching-te was unashamed and complacent in interpreting the election of himself and Hsiao Meiqin as "the most authentic choice for the future" of the people of Taiwan. According to Lai's logic, as long as he wins the election, it means that voters agree with all the ideas of the DPP and Lai Qingde. But in fact, the DPP was lucky enough to continue to be in power, but Lai Ching-te only received 40% of the vote, and the Green Camp did not have more than half of the public representative seats in Taiwan's legislative body, which constituted a "double minority rule." After Lai Ching-te won the election, most public opinion on the island expressed their dissatisfaction and concerns about the DPP and Lai Ching-te's "Taiwan independence" proposition, hoping to express their dissatisfaction to the mainland compatriots and the world through practical actions to cool down the cross-strait confrontation and warm up cross-strait people-to-people exchanges. The majority of the people convey the aspirations of the majority of public opinion in Taiwan to long for peace and oppose "Taiwan independence."
The second is to mistakenly turn the mainland's goodwill towards Taiwan compatriots into a bargaining chip for "Taiwan independence". After Lai Ching-te won the election, Taiwan's Taiwan Strait Patrol officials began to swell, and their malicious enforcement led to the "Vicious Ship Collision on February 14" during the Spring Festival. The bodies of mainland fishermen have not yet been returned. After Ma Ying-jeou's visit, the mainland stood on the standpoint of the Chinese nation, "grasping the overall interests of the cross-Strait relations from the overall interests and long-term development of the Chinese nation", "firmly guarding the common homeland of the Chinese nation", "firmly creating the long-lasting well-being of the Chinese nation", "firmly "Creating a strong sense of community for the Chinese nation" and "firmly realizing the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation", single-handedly maintaining the fragile peace across the Taiwan Strait. After Fu Kunqi led the public opinion representatives of the legislative body to visit the mainland, the mainland has successively released policies to facilitate Taiwan compatriots and facilitate exchanges, responding to the expectations of the majority of Taiwan's public opinion. The mainland's kindness to its compatriots is regarded by the Democratic Progressive Party authorities as "infiltration and division", and Lai Qingde has no respect for the hard-won cross-strait peace. Lai actually arrogantly claimed that "Taiwan is the helmsman of world peace." Instead, he regarded the mainland, which does not care about reputation or past grievances, as "the biggest strategic challenge to global peace and stability." He compared it with the military conflicts between Russia, Ukraine, and Palestine and Israel, and claimed that Taiwan was "Guarding the first hurdle of world peace", "demonstrating stable and principled leadership in cross-Strait relations, and achieving the goal of peace through strength." Lai's speech has been immersed in his own false discussion of "Taiwan independence" and cannot extricate himself. He is so arrogant that the text is not on topic, and the preface and follow-up are inconsistent. He regards hyping the threat from the mainland and even actively creating conflicts across the Taiwan Strait as capital to demand price from the United States and the West. Lai is like this If it continues, it will surely become a new troublemaker for peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.
The third is to misuse the "constitutional provisions of the Taiwan region" to promote "Taiwan independence." When Tsai Ing-wen took office, she clearly proposed that cross-Strait relations should be handled in accordance with the "Constitutional Provisions of the Taiwan Region" and the "Cross-Strait People's Relations Regulations." Her inaugural speech was called an "unfinished answer sheet." The "Constitutional Provisions of the Taiwan Area" were formulated on the mainland. Although they were frozen and revised many times later, both the text and the additional provisions of the "Constitutional Provisions" clearly stipulated that the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, one country, share a common destiny, and pursue reunification. Core essentials. The additional provisions clearly stipulate that "in order to meet the needs before national reunification", the "Cross-Strait People's Relations Regulations" also explicitly states that "before national reunification" is the condition. Lai Ching-te not only never mentioned the "Regulations on Relations between People across the Taiwan Strait", but also deliberately confused the concept when referring to the "Constitutional Provisions of the Taiwan Area", and conversely regarded the "Nationality Law", a lower-level law that was later formulated to facilitate the handling of specific matters, as the "Nationality Law" The basis for the "constitutional provisions of the Taiwan area" is that "only those with nationality are citizens", and based on this, it is inferred that "the Republic of China and the People's Republic of China are not affiliated with each other."
Fourth, we mistakenly regard geopolitical risks as business opportunities. Lai Qingde took Tsai Ing-wen's idea of not being a chess piece but a chess player, and wanted to be the protagonist by dancing on the edge of a knife. He actually said that he would "seize the business opportunities brought by geopolitical changes and develop military industry, security control and other industries." We need to use artificial intelligence to enhance our military power, we need to make Taiwan the Asian center of the democratic supply chain for drones, we need to develop medium and low-orbit satellites for the next generation of communications,” and we need to make Taiwan an “economic sun that never sets.” Lai firmly believes in his own ignorant and fearless statement, has no awareness of dangers and challenges, and is likely to become a spoiler that creates geopolitical risks