[steph]

Herein, I'd like share something with my friends from here. My sociology instructor always says that, " I donnot ask you to say the thing is true or right. Instead of judging the thing , I want to know how you analyze the cause.". That means, she wants us to know what we learned from the thing which is called social fact. Most of time in our life, we are judging thing(s) or person(s) unconsciously. However, the reason causes consequence has always been neglected. For instance, The mass media only describe those US school killers as victims of family violence or entourage of violent movies and video games. Nevertheless sociologist claims those crime accounts for boy masculinity, indeed. Either internet or forum is a society, as same as family and religion, has all the social behaviours. We spend too much time to judge and to wander about these complex behaviours which are human and natrual. Why not just simply, deeply, break in the surface and find out what we could see or learn to benifit ourselves permanently.

[eth]

When you talk about "breaking in the surface", I don't think that it can be done as "simply, deeply" as you mentioned in your text.

For example, let's look at "boy masculinity". Do you think that will be the final answer for the school shoting problem? What causes or stimulates or wakes up this "boy masculinity"? This is an endless process, and nobody can give you a final answer.

[steph]

Thanks for reading my post and showing your opinions here. Well, according to the example I choosed, to find *final answer about why those boys did school shooting will not be easy and simple for sure. But I think it is good and always good for us to look at the thing from an other angel which could go further when the mass media surrounding only put finger to violent movie or something we already knew about. Hence, this is same idea , I wrote above, I want to share with everybody, which is we should do less judge and more think. Then again, it will not be that simple as I thought and same deep as I expected. But it would be simple for me if I change my view point. And it would be deep for my thought when I go through the hazard and know that what really benifit myself without doubt.