[春風沂水]

剛才把這個5.45讀了一下，沒覺得有什麼不妥啊。

寫道:

Student Programs a) Teachers shall be encouraged to embed and integrate LGBTQ issues into existing curriculum in age-appropriate ways to help students acquire the skills and knowledge to understand the impacts of homophobia and transphobia upon society. b) School staffs shall be encouraged to support LGBTQ+ people by teaching about their positive contributions to society and modeling acceptance of diversity.

１。人家說了in age-appropriate ways ，沒說從小學１年級就開始教育吧。
２。人家說同性戀對社會是有貢獻的，並沒有說同性戀是對的，是好的，所以誤導的成分也不存在了。

所以大家到底在反對什麼？

[春風沂水]

And the policy is still a draft? So why so many people are so upset now?

[胡旋舞]

春風沂水 寫道:

And the policy is still a draft? So why so many people are so upset now?

I guess people want to prevent it from becoming offical...

[春風沂水]

胡旋舞 寫道:

春風沂水 寫道: And the policy is still a draft? So why so many people are so upset now? I guess people want to prevent it from becoming offical...

But what is their against point? You can not just say,"I don't like this policy".

[一步一腳印]

大多數反對的人從骨子裡就反對同性戀本身，壇子裡有人都自己承認了，所以反對這個不足為奇

[春風沂水]

一步一腳印 寫道:

大多數反對的人從骨子裡就反對同性戀本身，壇子裡有人都自己承認了，所以反對這個不足為奇

If they want to play the game, they have to know the rules and how to play. Otherwise, it's going to be a joke.

[名震一方]

反對理由上次他們聽證會的時候不就說了嗎？主要兩點：

1、反對讓孩子過早接觸這個話題。不止同性戀哦，還有雙性戀、變性、跨性等等OOXX的。一旦policy通過，這些東西都是一年級孩子就有可能接觸到的。

2、反對把有限資源花費在這些地方。一旦policy通過，學校就要在全校范圍內增加為同性雙性戀變性跨性專門提供的設施和supporting services.

而且這個policy明確支持性多樣性。倒不是說支持性多樣性有什麼不好，而是過早給孩子灌輸這個會讓他們很confuse。

其他黑箱操作之類的論點就是程序方面的支持了。

[春風沂水]

名震一方 寫道:

反對理由上次他們聽證會的時候不就說了嗎？主要兩點： 1、反對讓孩子過早接觸這個話題。不止同性戀哦，還有雙性戀、變性、跨性等等OOXX的。一旦policy通過，這些東西都是一年級孩子就有可能接觸到的。 2、反對把有限資源花費在這些地方。一旦policy通過，學校就要在全校范圍內增加為同性雙性戀變性跨性專門提供的設施和supporting services. 而且這個policy明確支持性多樣性。倒不是說支持性多樣性有什麼不好，而是過早給孩子灌輸這個會讓他們很confuse。 其他黑箱操作之類的論點就是程序方面的支持了。

Did you read?
1. It says in age-appropriate ways. There is no place mentioned they will offer this education from grade 1. BY the way, in the draft, you can even not find the word" education", so what are you worry about?

2. What kind of 專門提供的設施 they will offer? Special washrooms or classrooms? You have to find that out before you assuming a huge money invest.

[名震一方]

春風沂水 寫道:

名震一方 寫道: 反對理由上次他們聽證會的時候不就說了嗎？主要兩點： 1、反對讓孩子過早接觸這個話題。不止同性戀哦，還有雙性戀、變性、跨性等等OOXX的。一旦policy通過，這些東西都是一年級孩子就有可能接觸到的。 2、反對把有限資源花費在這些地方。一旦policy通過，學校就要在全校范圍內增加為同性雙性戀變性跨性專門提供的設施和supporting services. 而且這個policy明確支持性多樣性。倒不是說支持性多樣性有什麼不好，而是過早給孩子灌輸這個會讓他們很confuse。 其他黑箱操作之類的論點就是程序方面的支持了。 Did you read? 1. It says in age-appropriate ways. There is no place mentioned they will offer this education from grade 1. BY the way, in the draft, you can even not find the word" education", so what are you worry about? 2. What kind of 專門提供的設施 they will offer? Special washrooms or classrooms? You have to find that out before you assuming a huge money invest.

看來你白讀了。

1、這個policy要把增加為LGBTQ+提供的設施和services且“visible throughout schools”。且在圖書館等地增加跟LGBTQ+有關的書籍。這些全部都是一年級學生就能接觸到的，對不？最要命還鼓勵老師“ to embed and integrate LGBTQ issues into existing curriculum in
age-appropriate ways”。碰到個有點良知的老師還好，碰到個WBD老師就教1年紀孩子這些內容，有這個policy做後盾你還沒法告他。人家會說，啥叫“age-appropriate ways”？你沒定義啊

2、Policy根本沒定義啥設施和supporting servics，學校可以按他們認為正確的方式增加這些東西。你對這點happy不？

[webdriver]

春風沂水 寫道:

Did you read? 1. It says in age-appropriate ways. There is no place mentioned they will offer this education from grade 1. BY the way, in the draft, you can even not find the word" education", so what are you worry about? 2. What kind of 專門提供的設施 they will offer? Special washrooms or classrooms? You have to find that out before you assuming a huge money invest.

政策是模糊的，執行是靈活的 - 怎麼解讀在於執行的人。就不擔心有人越界？有些事情就是要防患於未燃。支持繼續研究，至少不要什麼都沒討論就通過。