[春风沂水]

刚才把这个5.45读了一下，没觉得有什么不妥啊。

写道:

Student Programs a) Teachers shall be encouraged to embed and integrate LGBTQ issues into existing curriculum in age-appropriate ways to help students acquire the skills and knowledge to understand the impacts of homophobia and transphobia upon society. b) School staffs shall be encouraged to support LGBTQ+ people by teaching about their positive contributions to society and modeling acceptance of diversity.

１。人家说了in age-appropriate ways ，没说从小学１年级就开始教育吧。
２。人家说同性恋对社会是有贡献的，并没有说同性恋是对的，是好的，所以误导的成分也不存在了。

所以大家到底在反对什么？

[春风沂水]

And the policy is still a draft? So why so many people are so upset now?

[胡旋舞]

春风沂水 写道:

And the policy is still a draft? So why so many people are so upset now?

I guess people want to prevent it from becoming offical...

[春风沂水]

胡旋舞 写道:

春风沂水 写道: And the policy is still a draft? So why so many people are so upset now? I guess people want to prevent it from becoming offical...

But what is their against point? You can not just say,"I don't like this policy".

[一步一脚印]

大多数反对的人从骨子里就反对同性恋本身，坛子里有人都自己承认了，所以反对这个不足为奇

[春风沂水]

一步一脚印 写道:

大多数反对的人从骨子里就反对同性恋本身，坛子里有人都自己承认了，所以反对这个不足为奇

If they want to play the game, they have to know the rules and how to play. Otherwise, it's going to be a joke.

[名震一方]

反对理由上次他们听证会的时候不就说了吗？主要两点：

1、反对让孩子过早接触这个话题。不止同性恋哦，还有双性恋、变性、跨性等等OOXX的。一旦policy通过，这些东西都是一年级孩子就有可能接触到的。

2、反对把有限资源花费在这些地方。一旦policy通过，学校就要在全校范围内增加为同性双性恋变性跨性专门提供的设施和supporting services.

而且这个policy明确支持性多样性。倒不是说支持性多样性有什么不好，而是过早给孩子灌输这个会让他们很confuse。

其他黑箱操作之类的论点就是程序方面的支持了。

[春风沂水]

名震一方 写道:

反对理由上次他们听证会的时候不就说了吗？主要两点： 1、反对让孩子过早接触这个话题。不止同性恋哦，还有双性恋、变性、跨性等等OOXX的。一旦policy通过，这些东西都是一年级孩子就有可能接触到的。 2、反对把有限资源花费在这些地方。一旦policy通过，学校就要在全校范围内增加为同性双性恋变性跨性专门提供的设施和supporting services. 而且这个policy明确支持性多样性。倒不是说支持性多样性有什么不好，而是过早给孩子灌输这个会让他们很confuse。 其他黑箱操作之类的论点就是程序方面的支持了。

Did you read?
1. It says in age-appropriate ways. There is no place mentioned they will offer this education from grade 1. BY the way, in the draft, you can even not find the word" education", so what are you worry about?

2. What kind of 专门提供的设施 they will offer? Special washrooms or classrooms? You have to find that out before you assuming a huge money invest.

[名震一方]

春风沂水 写道:

名震一方 写道: 反对理由上次他们听证会的时候不就说了吗？主要两点： 1、反对让孩子过早接触这个话题。不止同性恋哦，还有双性恋、变性、跨性等等OOXX的。一旦policy通过，这些东西都是一年级孩子就有可能接触到的。 2、反对把有限资源花费在这些地方。一旦policy通过，学校就要在全校范围内增加为同性双性恋变性跨性专门提供的设施和supporting services. 而且这个policy明确支持性多样性。倒不是说支持性多样性有什么不好，而是过早给孩子灌输这个会让他们很confuse。 其他黑箱操作之类的论点就是程序方面的支持了。 Did you read? 1. It says in age-appropriate ways. There is no place mentioned they will offer this education from grade 1. BY the way, in the draft, you can even not find the word" education", so what are you worry about? 2. What kind of 专门提供的设施 they will offer? Special washrooms or classrooms? You have to find that out before you assuming a huge money invest.

看来你白读了。

1、这个policy要把增加为LGBTQ+提供的设施和services且“visible throughout schools”。且在图书馆等地增加跟LGBTQ+有关的书籍。这些全部都是一年级学生就能接触到的，对不？最要命还鼓励老师“ to embed and integrate LGBTQ issues into existing curriculum in
age-appropriate ways”。碰到个有点良知的老师还好，碰到个WBD老师就教1年纪孩子这些内容，有这个policy做后盾你还没法告他。人家会说，啥叫“age-appropriate ways”？你没定义啊

2、Policy根本没定义啥设施和supporting servics，学校可以按他们认为正确的方式增加这些东西。你对这点happy不？

[webdriver]

春风沂水 写道:

Did you read? 1. It says in age-appropriate ways. There is no place mentioned they will offer this education from grade 1. BY the way, in the draft, you can even not find the word" education", so what are you worry about? 2. What kind of 专门提供的设施 they will offer? Special washrooms or classrooms? You have to find that out before you assuming a huge money invest.

政策是模糊的，执行是灵活的 - 怎么解读在于执行的人。就不担心有人越界？有些事情就是要防患于未燃。支持继续研究，至少不要什么都没讨论就通过。