NDP真超蛋，居然跑到美國去做工作，要反對加拿大在美國的輸油管道項目

flying2u 寫道:

Really? Why not we keep our crude in our own country and refine it ourself? Export oil only can make us loosing more jobs in the future. We want to export high value added products not only raw material. Do we really want to be another Saudi?

The last refinery was built in north America was about 30 years ago, if you know the why, you won't ask the these questions.

commonsense 寫道:

現在不是利益分配的問題。問題是美國的傻瓜嫌死的不夠快,千方百計地自殺。美國在經濟上已經競爭不過中國了,現在那些傻瓜還在扼殺自己的經濟,把資源和發展機會往中國推 要回到原始社會才遂這些白癡的心願。 等死吧,等環保了,美國也該給中國買下來了,等著到時吃糠做牛馬吧,夠環保的。 很懷疑這些環保人士和NDP是不是中共的地下黨員。

中國巨額的外匯儲備額頭先拿了許多美國國債,及次貸前發行的東東。2008次貸危機後,中國一看手上的貶值很多,從美國引進多個“優秀”基金經理人,操盤手,提倡分散風險投資,投了許多歐洲債券。結果現在----

從貿易戰爭中,中國以犧牲資源為代價換回來的錢,通過金融戰爭又一次輸了出去。印度有個諾經濟獎得主的理論,這就是“悲慘性伴隨”

要報效祖國,得有大批真心實意、且懂經濟的操盤手,千萬不可沽名學老陳,把中國當作塊肥肉,愛中國為能咬下幾塊肉

vanxiong2008 寫道:

我們老了的時候,會是如何?

俺正在想這個問題。

入對行很重要,比如中國的電信業,連看門的老頭拿的也比紡織廠看門的老頭多。在中國,搞實業辦工廠的斂集財富的速度和房地產、上市真是雲泥之別

銀行、金融業可能式微的話,接下來的二十年----都說是資源類

反對輸油管的人多了起來----一個國際環保團體加入了進來。他們擔憂項目對環境的影響。他們認為55億美元的項目將對全省山川河流和海岸線構成不可接受的風險。
原住民中也有人反對

An international alliance of environmental groups has joined the growing chorus of opponents to a massive oil pipeline proposal for northern B.C.

A collection of groups including the Natural Resources Defense Council and the Pembina Institute released a report Tuesday arguing that the $5.5-billion Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline poses an unacceptable risk to the province's mountain rivers and pristine coastline.

Catherine Stewart of the Living Oceans Society says the pipeline would threaten the Great Bear Rainforest -- the only place in the world where the white spirit bear can be found.

"It's just a huge gamble for very little return," she told CTV News.

"There are a host of concerns. The pipeline would be running through extremely treacherous terrain prone to landslides."

The pipeline would pump half a million barrels of bitumen from the oil sands in Alberta through to Kitimat, where it would be loaded onto supertankers bound for Asia.

First Nations groups and environmental activists have been speaking out against the project for years. They were emboldened this month when the American Keystone XL pipeline was sidelined because of potential impacts on the environmentally sensitive Sandhills region of Nebraska.

B.C. First Nations opposed to the Northern Gateway project are holding a news conference Thursday to discuss the pipeline.

"Oil can never be cleaned up. I've seen it on the coastlines -- gobs of oil coming up to the coastline, wildlife being destroyed," said Geraldine Thomas-Flurer of the Yinka Dene Alliance.

Enbridge disputes the environmental claims and says it's working on revenue-sharing deals with many First Nations.

A decision on the project is likely more than a year a year away, but it's quietly being endorsed by governments in Ottawa and Victoria, where officials are tempted by jobs and economic spinoffs.

But BC NDP environment critic Rob Fleming says the benefits aren't worth the risk.

"There are some environmental challenges that cannot be mitigated. There are some risks that are too great," he said.

www.ctvbc.ctv.ca/servl...lumbiaHome

原住民之間為該項目吵架----


卑詩Gitxsan原住民部族大酋長德瑞克(Elmer Derrick)因同意Enbridge公司提供的入股條件,2日公開支持北方門戶油管計畫(Northern Gateway Oil Pipeline),但隨即遭到其他酋長反對,其至包含同一部族分支領袖。

德瑞克先前指出,與Enbridge公司的談判取得高度互信基礎,入股協議預期可為族人帶來超過700萬元淨收益。這項聲明一出,隨即遭到Gitsxan部族四個分支領袖及其他酋長反對。

反對聲明中指出,德瑞克與Gitxsan條約組織暨經濟發展公司並不能代表Gitxsan部族所有人的意見,Enbridge公司從未征詢部族意見,並批評德瑞克在環境評估未完成前就簽約是項錯誤的決定,他應該感到羞恥。


Read more: 世界新聞網-北美華人社區新聞 - 大酋長允建油管 分支領袖扯後腿