- 平行空间 评论时间: 2025-05-04 00:37:11, 赞: 0, 回复数: 0
[quote="游客"]虽然很同情受害者家属,但说难聽点,凭甚么全BC的驾驶要替一个疯子买单?旧制度没完没了的上诉肥了受害者,ICBC转过头来加所有人的保费这样就公平吗?个体平时就该自身购买意外险,又不贵,我夫妻俩各保一百万一年保费也才$700[/quote] 是肥了那些律师。
- 游客 [辛.昔.四.篇] 评论时间: 2025-05-03 21:49:15, 赞: 1, 回复数: 0
死伤那么多人,你用“funny”谈论保险赔付?遣词造句要符合语意语境。你的BCIT老师没教过,还是你的书白读了?
- 游客 [辛.香.氏.说] 评论时间: 2025-05-03 11:23:58, 赞: 2, 回复数: 1
The funny thing is that people complain high insurance rates before they get involved into accidents. They start to complain the compensations are not enough after they get injured in accidents. Of course, lawyers support law suites as they make money from that. That was actually the complaint that lots of money flowed to the pockets of lawyers. Nothing is justice if nobody prepares for loss by buying additional coverage of insurance. It is not fair to ask everybody to pay just because they do not have enough insurance.
- 游客 [次.昔.取.载] 评论时间: 2025-05-03 06:51:07, 赞: 0, 回复数: 0
占道举办活动,压缩其他人的道路使用权,本来就不应该,举办方应该赔偿受害人的损伤。
- 游客 [此.甲.陵.射] 评论时间: 2025-05-03 06:46:45, 赞: 1, 回复数: 0
虽然很同情受害者家属,但说难聽点,凭甚么全BC的驾驶要替一个疯子买单?旧制度没完没了的上诉肥了受害者,ICBC转过头来加所有人的保费这样就公平吗?个体平时就该自身购买意外险,又不贵,我夫妻俩各保一百万一年保费也才$700
- 游客 [曰.至.文.治] 评论时间: 2025-05-02 19:54:39, 赞: 0, 回复数: 0
那要是持刀精神病杀人咋处理?赔偿